The 2016 awards season started last month with the announcement of the Stella Prize longlist. The shortlist will, in fact, be announced tomorrow, March 10, but I’ll report on that next month. I’m thrilled that of the 12 books listed on the longlist, 11 have been reviewed for our challenge. Go team! The twelfth is Fiona Wright’s book of essays, Small acts of disappearance. It would be lovely, whether or not it makes the shortlist, to see it also reviewed for the challenge.
A somewhat slow month with just 20 reviews, which is 9 fewer than we had last February – even though we had an extra day this year. Wah! But, don’t worry, I won’t be castigating you wonderful band of reviewers since my contribution this month was a woeful 1! People in glass houses, and all that! Fortunately, there are some worthwhile things to report:
- Our top news is that there was at least one reviewer who worked hard this month, Kim Forrester, an Australian expat in England! She has declared 2016 an Australian reading year. Of course, she’s reading Australian men too, but this month she reviewed four Aussie women writers for her cleverly named blog Reading Matters. Thanks Kim. Challenge stalwart Jennifer Cameron-Smith, and Kate (Books are My Favourite and Best), contributed two reviews each.
- Three books were reviewed twice: Eliza Henry-Jones’ In the quiet, Dominique Wilson’s That devil’s madness, and Charlotte Wood’s The natural way of things.
- Only three of the books reviewed were published before 2012, and only two of those before 2000.
Just one classic was reviewed this month, Elizabeth Jolley’s Milk and honey, which was published in 1984. It’s a borderline classic, and in fact our reviewer Amanda, writing on GoodReads, didn’t classify it as so, but, with Jolley now gone, and her first books now over 30 years old, I’m inclined to put these books in the Classics category.
Now, to the book. Amanda starts her review by saying “I came to this book knowing nothing about it, and I have put it down feeling very much the same”. She found the novel, which, like other Jolley novels, is set in an undefined place and time, rather confusing, but she says:
I don’t think that any of the confusion is a fault of the text. I think Jolley is being deliberately ambiguous in her writing, blurring a lot of the lines to give a sense of the very self-involved and sheltered lives these characters lead, how withdrawn they are from the world and how this affects their perspectives and actions, and perhaps stability.
Have you read Milk and honey? What do you think about it?
Stella Prize Longlist
I am in awe of Ms Wood’s ability to draw the reader into this world, learning gradually (as the women did) of what was happening to them.
It’s a sparse, unappealing story in some ways – profane, violent, mean, it makes for very uncomfortable reading at times. And yet I didn’t stop reading, I couldn’t. … I can see how it isn’t a book for everyone. Still it’s a powerful story and well written.
The other Stella longlisted book reviewed this month has, in fact, only received one review to date – by expat Aussie journalist, Kim. The book is Jen Craig’s Panthers and the Museum of Fire, published by the wonderfully named small press, Spineless Wonders. Kim starts by saying that she “didn’t expect to read another book quite as surprising or as unique as Gerald Murnane’s The Plains” during her read-only-Australian-literature-year. Hmmm, this got my attention. She describes it as “fresh and bold and startling” but also a “reviewer’s nightmare”. It’s about a woman returning a manuscript, written by a friend who has just died, to that friend’s sister. She’s been asked not to read it. Interesting set up, n’est-ce pas? Kim concludes:
I really loved this book: it “wowed” me from its puzzling start to its satisfying conclusion. It took me on a real journey — in my head. It’s clever and wears its intelligence on its sleeve. It’s not a passive read, nor is it a sedate one. It makes you think and gives your brain a real work out. As a result, it may leave you exhausted — and breathless — but it’s worth every tantalising, carefully placed word.
Multiply reviewed novels
I discussed Wood’s novel, one of this month’s three multiply reviewed novels above, so thought the other two also deserved highlighting.
I hadn’t heard of Eliza Henry-Jones’ debut novel In the quiet until I came to work on this post. It was reviewed by Kate (Books are My Favourite and Best) and Julia Tulloh Harper. Its premise is one that puts some readers off: the narrator is a mother who has died but is still “out there”, able to watch over and tell the story of her husband and children. (A bit like The lovely bones?)
Kate enjoyed much about it:
The language is simple (had it been too sentimental, this book would have strayed in to the hen-lit zone and out of my reading stack).
Overall, though, she found the plot unconvincing in places, and the voice a little detached. She’d read the author again though. Julia, too, liked much about it. She seemed to like the mother Cate’s voice:
What I liked about Cate (dead narrator) telling the story was the sense of personal specificity she brought to the story telling; she knows her kids, husband, friends, horses and property so well that many times I felt as pained and heartbroken as she did to watch everyone work out what it means to keep going after someone close to you has died.
Julia did, though, find the writing strained at times, but nonetheless thinks that it’s “one of the best and most sophisticated debuts I’ve read in ages”.
Dominique Wilson’s That devil’s madness is a second novel, and has an exotic (to we Aussies) setting, Algeria. It’s one of those novels which shifts between present and past, between Nicolette, an Australian photojournalist who goes to Algeria in the 1970s, and her ancestors who moved there searching for a better life in the late 1890s.
Monique (WriteNoteReviews) liked the book, writing
That Devil’s Madness simmers with emotional tension from start to finish, and paints a multi-layered portrait of conflict: idealism versus duty, friendship versus loyalty, war versus peace, tradition versus progression, male roles versus female roles.
She says that despite its setting in the late 19th century and the 1970s it’s very relevant today because these conflicts are still real. She concludes that “Wilson is an undervalued literary writer … I’d like to see her get some more attention.”
Sam (Sam Still Reading) enjoyed it immensely describing it as a captivating story that fully engaged her. She says:
The two narratives are expertly interwoven, Wilson has the knack of knowing at the right moment when to switch and when to offer a titbit from the past that explains why the modern characters are acting the way they do.
She concludes that “I know literary fiction can sometimes be tainted with the ‘dull’ tag but this novel defies the stereotypes and combines skilled writing with a fast paced storyline”!
Is literary fiction often dull? If you agree, what makes it so?
I am Whispering Gums and I read, review and blog about (mostly) literary fiction. It was reading Jane Austen when I was 14 years old that turned me on to reading literary fiction/classics, which is why I am here today doing this round-up! Little did Jane know what she started!
My love of Aussie literature started with Banjo Paterson’s ballads and Ethel Turner’s Seven Little Australians in my childhood. But, I didn’t really discover Australian women’s writing until the 1980s when I “met” and fell in love with Elizabeth Jolley, Thea Astley, Olga Masters, Helen Garner and Kate Grenville. Ever since then I have been making sure to include a good percentage of Australian (and other) women writers in my reading diet.
I read In the Quiet last year but didn’t review it as I refrain from writing what could be seen as a negative review, simply because the content/story line is completely not my thing. I remember liking the writing and tone enough to pop Jones’ name into the back of my mind, though, to wait and see what she might produce next.
I think some literary fiction tries too hard to be clever at the expense of a good story. But of course, it’s horses for courses. For instance, I loved Brooks’ The Secret Chord but I’ve spoken to lots of people who really struggled to get into it.
Hopefully I will boost your numbers for the March reviews (if I can stop myself in my indulgent trip down memory lane atm with my favourite childhood classics:-)
Nice to hear from you Brona. I can understand about In the quiet, and it does sound like many of those who like it have reservations. I must say I’ve heard mixed feelings about The secret chord so am probably not going to read it, given what else I have on my plate.
I do hope you help our numbers in March. I surely am going to contribute more than 1. If I don’t I think I’ll have to hide away in embarrassment.
Thanks for flagging up my blog and some of my reviews, but my last name is Forrester, not Forrest 😉
Apologies, Kim, and thanks for bringing it to our attention. Fixed now.
Oops, sorry Kim. I should have got that right. Many apologies.