As there are fewer reviews of collections of short stories, and individual short stories, than in other genres, we’ve scheduled the roundups of these for every few months. However, in the nearly-four months of this year, there have been 38 reviews of short stories, which is half of the number reviewed last year! It’s great to see so much enthusiasm for the form.
Of the books reviewed, the most popular was Cate Kennedy’s Like a House on Fire, with five reviews.  This book has already done well in the prize lists, with a shortlisting for the Stella Prize, and longlistings for the Australian Literature Society Gold Medal and the Kibble award for established women writers. Kathy from Play, Eat, Live, Learn  ‘connected deeply with Kennedy’s stories and her characters,’ finding them ‘unbearably moving, some thought-provoking, some peppered with humour (although on the whole, these are not funny stories) but none heavy handed or contrived.’ Janine of Resident Judge, who isn’t a fan of the genre, became a convert (at least with this collection), writing that ‘Every single one of [the stories] is memorable, and for me that’s a big thing. All too often I find myself reading the next story in a collection because the last one has been too insubstantial.’ Denise on Goodreads found the stories easy to read, but their subject matter was hard to stomach as so much of it was about loss and lack. I also enjoyed the collection, and reviewed it here. If Not, Read, who is familiar with Kennedy’s work, found the collection inconsistent, commenting that ‘Kennedy’s skillful writing comes through in some stories but several pieces fall well short of her usual precise story-telling ability.’ It’s always refreshing to read a variety of responses to a work, as literature is fiercely subjective and reviews should reflect this.
Other collections of short literary fiction included reviews of individual stories from Barbara Baynton’s collection Bush Studies. Sue of Whispering Gums analysed Baynton’s masterful use of the Gothic in ‘A Dreamer’, and of her use of humour as a screen for the less savoury aspects of early bush life, such as misogyny, in ‘Scrammy ‘and’. Kate Rizzetti penned a review of Fire, edited by Western Australian academic Delys Bird, and referred to it as an ‘important piece of work, reminding us that we live in a dangerous time in our history and we are less in control of our surroundings than we believe ourselves to be.’ The work also needs to be consumed slowly, she writes, like very dark chocolate. Marisa wrote that Amanda Curtin, in Inherited, ‘will drag you into the landscape of her stories,’ while the writing in Jess Huon’s The Dark Wet was the loveliest I’ve read in ages.
Speculative Fiction was the most popular genre, making up nearly half of the reviews (17 in total). A number of books in the Twelve Planets series, which consists of twelve books of speculative fiction by Australian women writers, were covered.  Kaaron Warren’s Through Splintered Walls, which consists of three short stories and a novella, was reviewed by  Tsana. She describes the short stories as ‘almost the kind of creepy tales you might tell around a camp fire at night’ whereas the novella was unsettling, and seems to feature a cat food factory grinder (I’m glad I got the heads up on that one). Sean also reviewed the collection, and recommended it to those who enjoy ‘good, understated horror, horror in the everyday’.  Meanwhile, Tansy Rayner Roberts’ Love and Romanpunk was reviwed by Mel at Subversive Reader, who has found the Twelve Planets series to be ‘a great way to be introduced to Australian speculative fiction.’  Asymmetry by Thoraiya Dyer is the most recently published book, contributing to the Twelve Planets series’ extremely positive reception. Alex from Randomly Yours describes the theme of its stories as ‘a lack of balance, especially in power; sometimes, also, a lack of balance in an individual’s life, making them particularly vulnerable to direct manipulation or simply life’s vicissitudes’ while Tsana found the stories complex and innovative, dealing with different ways of belonging.
Other speculative fiction titles that were reviewed include two by the prolific Isobelle Carmody: Green Monkey Dreams (which Mel at MelReviewsBooks really enjoyed and Metro Winds (also reviewed by Mel), while fairy stories and myths also made an appearance in Prickle Moon by Juliet Marillier, reviewed by Stephanie, and in Fairy Tales for Freya by Georgina Ann Taylor, reviewed by Lynxie at Goodreads.
Romance also featured in reviews of Christmas Wishes and Valentine’s Dates by Lauren at The Australian Bookshelf, who enjoyed both of them.  Lauren also reviewed Room Service, which ‘didn’t quite dish up what was on the menu.’  Sally from Oz found Loretta Hill’s One Little White Lie ‘fast paced, light and entertaining read,’ while ShelleyRae from Book’d Out reviewed Margaret Lynette Sharp’s Long and Short Australian Stories, describing it as a ‘congenial, mellow short story collection and an easy read for a quiet evening.’
There were quite a few other collections reviewed that I don’t have the space to refer to here. If you’d like to see what else is being reviewed, or if you need some ideas for reading, head over to the 2013 Short Stories page.
About Me
I’m Jessica White, a writer and researcher. I have a PhD from the University of London and have published two novels with Penguin, A Curious Intimacy (2007) and Entitlement (2012).  My short stories have been published in Overland, Island, Southerly and the Review of Australian Fiction.  You can find more information about me at my website. I’m also on Twitter @ladyredjess.
Thanks for the links Jessica … nice to see this round-up. Given what seems to be a fairly wide lack of enthusiasm for short stories by literary fiction bloggers, I’ve been intrigued since becoming involved in this challenge by how many short stories there are in the SF area – and how keenly read they seem to be. I love it; I must give some of them a go (when time permits!).
If you don’t mind macabre creepiness in your fiction, I highly recommend Joanne Anderton’s Bone Chime Song and Other Stories. (But I’m really not joking about the creepiness.) For a bit more author variety (and less… macabre ick factor), you could do worse than giving One Small Step edited by Tehani Wessely a go.
Thanks Tsana … I’ll keep them in mind, probably the less creepy one!
Thanks too Tsana. I haven’t read anything scary for ages so I’ll look them up as well! I was wondering if you might also have any thoughts on why SF readers are happier to pick up a short story collection than readers of literary fiction? Are there just generally more books of short fiction circulating in the SF genre?
I really can’t comment as to whether there are more short stories in spec fic than other genres because I just don’t know enough about other genres. But I can speculate as to why short stories are relatively popular in spec fic.
Historically, the science fiction that kicked off the genre we know today was published in pulp magazines (way back in the day) and mostly consisted of short stories. Science fiction novels came alone a bit later (obviously there were science fiction novels before that but I’m talking about the ones riding on the popularity of the pulp magazines, some of which were serialised in said magazines) and the SF short stories were joined by fantasy in similar (or the same) magazines. Some of these early magazines are still around today (Analog in the US was started in 1930!), although I dare say the quality has improved in many cases, and many new ones have sprung up particularly online in recent years. Even though I grew up much too late to read any pulp magazines, their legacy is strong, even as the stories have become less pulpy.
Australia specifically has a few strong magazines (Andromeda Spaceways, Aurealis, others that come and go) and several small presses that like to publish anthologies and collections as well.
At the risk of this reply getting much too long, the fact that the short story is a good size to explore one new idea at a time probably helps. A lot of spec fic is very much about ideas (technology/science, magic) as well as people.
Wow, this is fascinating stuff! Thanks so much for sharing Tsana. It makes sense too that it’s a good form for experimenting, many of my ideas for novels start off in stories. Novels also had their precursors in letters and in the serial form (esp in the 19th C) but I’m still wondering why they don’t have more of a grip in literary fiction. I need to think some more 🙂
Hi Sue, yes, that’s a pretty accurate observation! I’m not sure why it’s panned out that way. Other SF readers would be better placed than me to make recommendations, but I thought Margo Lanagan’s ‘Cracklescape’ was wonderful.